Evaluation and Testing Applied to ENRICH WP 3, WP 5, and WP 6

 

Checklist for Evaluation Criteria

Back

 

Criterion

Category

Components to pay attention in evaluation

Your evaluation:
0 – 4

 

 

 

Interoperability

Object

· Objects and their relationships are uniquely and permanently identified

· Adequate metadata for formal and content-based description

· Identification of the digital objects ingests

· Adequate metadata available for structural description of the digital objects acquired

 

Tool

· OAI-PMH compliant (required)

 

Process

· The assignment of metadata to the objects is guaranteed at all times

· Metadata for documenting changes made on the digital objects

 

Repository

· Repository acquires adequate metadata for technical description of the digital objects

· Repository acquires adequate metadata to record the corresponding usage rights and conditions

· Compatibility of used metadata with other standard metadata systems

 

 

 

Adaptability

Object

· Ease of working on code base: add/ change digital object

 

Tool

· Software and hardware tools - only common/basic software and hardware required

· Possibility to add other media files (for example audio, video)

· Documentation of software (M-tool, M-edit) is sufficient

 

Process

· Ability to customize look and feel - change the header, theme, footer in personalized area

· Ease of publishing - inexperienced users of the repository can easily publish content

· Installation, dependencies and portability

 

Repository

· Separate repository and branding for each institution

 

 

Usability

Object

· Corresponds to Web Content Accessibility (W3) Guidelines (perceivable, operable, understandable, robust)

· Scalable fonts and graphics

 

Tool

· Reliability of tools: maturity, fault tolerance, recoverability, availability

· Cross-browser support, not dependent critically on Java Script

 

Process

· Text only navigation support

· Operable to users with disabilities

· Efficiency: time behavior, resource utilization

· Accessibility of distributed content

 

Repository

· Transparent, accessible website

· Effectively searchable repository

 

 

Security

Object

· Ability to restrict access at repository item level (e.g. view metadata but not content)

 

Tool

   

Process

· The authentication used by the repository to authenticate user.

· The main aspects of application security supported

 

Repository

· Backup strategies for safety of content

· The infrastructure implements the security demands of the IT security system.

 

 

Multilingual

Object

· Unicode text editing and storage available

 

Tool

· Ability to present multilingual object description

· Description of software in several languages

 

Process

· Multilingual user interface

· Multilingual search ability

 

Repository

· Localized to relevant languages

 

 

This list is created in order to help you to express better your opinion across the quality criteria used. But you are free to mark simply one box in the line of scores 0 1 2 3 4 in the interactive form of Questionnaire, provided in website, corresponding to your informal opinion, which when formalized, means a range from “failed” to “excellent” explained in Recommendations for Respondents.

 

Back

 

Home