Evaluation and Testing Applied to ENRICH WP 6

 

  • The main part of this questionnaire consists of questions, concerning results achieved in WPs during the first year work in the project. Please consider each one carefully and choose "Yes" or "No". Then fix your rating of the Criteria evaluated in resulting to 5-point scale (from 0 - failed to 4 - excellent) by submitting your opinion.

  • The numeration of the questions below is strictly related to the Tasks formulated in ENRICH WPs, Description of Work. For example: 6.1.1 a), b) means - WP 6, the Task 6.1, the first sub task of it considered in respect of two different aspects a) and b).

  • If respondents feel that they cannot evaluate a particular item, they should read carefully the Checklist for Evaluation Criteria which will help you to deliver a reliable evaluation.

  • After completing the questionnaire, please press the SUBMIT button at the bottom of this page to submit your responses. The information you provide is kept completely confidential.

 

Your evaluation will be more successful if you read Recommendations for Respondents and The Checklist for Evaluation Criteria. First of all identify yourself as belonging to one of four user's classes specified below.

 

Please tick the appropriate box indicating that your opinions are based on the experience of:

 

Content provider, information manager
Technical personnel, supporting staff
Scholar, researcher in historical documents
End-user having general interests

 

General scale from 0 to 4 has to be used for any approach of evaluation applied (your personal opinion or according the check list added separately)

   
The metrics used for evaluation means:

0 - Failed or feature does not exist

1 - Has poor support and/or it can be done but with significant effort

2 - Fair support but needs modification to reach the desired level of support

3 - Good support and needs a minimal amount of effort

4 - Excellent support and meets the criteria, minimal effort.
 

WP 6. MULTILINGUAL & USER FRIENDLY SOPHISTICATED ACCESS

 

Task 6.1 Multilingual access development (m1-m12). Task leader: SYS

 

The Content/Associated Partners are kindly asked to answer the questions below by ticking „Yes“ or „No“ based on their experience visiting the translation evaluation interface, developed by SYSTRAN.

Please read the additional information and explanations aiming to help your evaluation activities

 

The resulting score of the corresponding criteria, assigned by you to that item – the sum of yours „Yes“, will be shown automatically in the next line after those questions.

 

Multilingual access via the API integration in the data retrieval interface associated or independent of a multilingual search of digital object (corresponding to the Task 6.1.1 - a)

Yes

No
1. Is a time of integration acceptable?

2. Is the facility in customization well designed and helpfull?

3. Is the speed satifying?

4. Is the rendering acceptable?

   
 

Failed

      

Excellent
Resulting evaluation of the MULTILINGUALITY / Object:


0


1


2


3


4
 

 

Multilingual access via the API integration in the data retrieval interface associated or independent of a multilingual search processing (corresponding to the Task 6.1.1 - b)

Yes

No
1. Is the speed satisfying?

2. Is the formatting well resolved?

3. Is the rendering acceptable?

4. Is your interaction with the system easy to be established?

   
 

Failed

      

Excellent
Resulting evaluation of the MULTILINGUALITY / Process:


0


1


2


3


4

 

 

Multilingual access dedicated translation interface where ENRICH expert users can fine-tune dynamically the machine translation tools thanks to adapted linguistic tools for terminology extraction and translation post-editing and customization (corresponding to the Task 6.1.2 - a)

Yes

No
1. Is the interface intutive/user friendly enough?

2. Are you satisfied with the Quality Assessment?

3. Is your interaction with the translation interface easy to be established?

4. Is the integration satisfying?

   
 

Failed

      

Excellent
Resulting evaluation of the MULTILINGUALITY / Tools:


0


1


2


3


4

 

 

Multilingual access dedicated translation interface in repository (corresponding to the Task 6.1.2 - b)

Yes

No
1. Are you satisfied with accessibility of repository?

2. Is the interaction in repository easy to be established?

3. Are you satisfied with the Quality Assessment in repository?

4. Is the Repository Update satisfying?

   
 

Failed

      

Excellent
Resulting evaluation of the MULTILINGUALITY / Repository:


0


1


2


3


4

 

Are you satisfied with your evaluation? The rating is from 0 = <failled/feature don’t exist> to 4 = <Excellent>:

 

 

Failed

      

Excellent
MULTILINGUALITY / Object


0


1


2


3


4
MULTILINGUALITY / Process


0


1


2


3


4
MULTILINGUALITY / Tools


0


1


2


3


4
MULTILINGUALITY / Repository


0


1


2


3


4

 

If the results seems acceptable, please click on <Submit>, if not, return back to the questions.

 

You were invited to evaluate results by: *


See statistics...

 

 

For evaluation read more and visit translation evaluation interface, developed by SYSTRAN.

 

Evaluation and Testing Applied to ENRICH WP 3, WP 4, WP 5, and WP 6

 

The all project partners have to participate in evaluation process. Thank you for your efforts in evaluating the first results derived in WPs until December 2008.

Home